{"id":23603,"date":"2025-01-28T16:29:07","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T16:29:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T16:32:53","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T16:32:53","slug":"tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe","status":"publish","type":"ip-law","link":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/","title":{"rendered":"Tour de France \u201cblows\u201d its appeal against the Tour de X brand in Europe"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><em>By A\u00edda Tar\u00ed L\u00e1zaro, Head of the Trademarks and Brand Intelligence Department at PONS IP<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On 12 June 2024, just before the start of the well-known Tour de France, the General Court of the European Union (CJEU) dismissed the appeal brought in case T-604\/22 by the Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 du Tour de France, seeking annulment of the decision of the Board of Appeal of EUIPO concerning the registration of the European Union trademark for, inter alia, sporting activities.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"114\" height=\"44\" src=\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/Le-TOUR.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-23505\"\/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>In its decision, the General Court upholds the decision essentially on the basis of the previous analysis and considers that the use of the mark TOUR DE X for the goods and services concerned, classes 25, 28 and 41, will not take unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of the trademarks of the Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 du Tour de France nor will the public establish a link between the signs, since, inter alia, the distinctive character enhanced by the use and the repute of the marks Tour de France and Le Tour de France do not extend to the common element of the marks at issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Introduction | Background<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In May 2017, the German company FitX Beteiligungs GmbH, filed an application for registration of the trademark TOUR DE X for various goods such as clothing, games or sports equipment, as well as educational services in the field of sport, training or entertainment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Following opposition from the French company Tour de France, known in the world of cycling, on the basis of its word marks \u201cTOUR DE FRANCE\u201d and \u201cLE TOUR DE FRANCE\u201d, EUIPO considered that although the goods and services were identical or similar, there was no likelihood of confusion and that the use of the new application did not take unfair advantage of the original marks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The General Court finds that the differences between the signs and the average distinctive character of the letter \u201cx\u201d considerably reduce the similarity resulting from the common expression \u201ctour de\u201d and its position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It therefore concludes that the signs have a low degree of visual and phonetic similarity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Even if the contested mark were perceived as referring to a cycling competition, there would only be a low degree of conceptual similarity because the relevant public would distinguish said competition from the specific competition which is the Tour de France.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As regards the greater distinctiveness and repute of the earlier marks TOUR DE FRANCE and LE TOUR DE FRANCE which were shown to have been acquired through use, it is where the GC introduces in the decision that it applies to the earlier rights as a whole, and not to the element \u201ctour de\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, due to the low degree of distinctiveness of the common element \u201ctour de\u201d and the low degree of similarity between the signs, there is no likelihood of confusion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It adds that even if the repute of the earlier marks were exceptionally high, the descriptive expression \u201ctour de\u201d, which is very commonly used in the context of cycling competitions, has very little, if any, distinctive character.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore, the use of this expression alone will not mislead or induce the relevant public to establish a link between the marks, and the use of the contested sign is not likely to take unfair advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Conclusions<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This decision only confirms the fact that trademarks are unlikely to be considered similar and that a likelihood of confusion will be recognised where the common element has little distinctive character.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The repute of a trademark as a whole does not automatically extend to the weak or non-distinctive elements included in it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":23517,"template":"","categorias-ip-litigations":[116],"class_list":["post-23603","ip-law","type-ip-law","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","categorias-ip-litigations-trademarks"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Tour de France \u201cblows\u201d its appeal against the Tour de X brand in Europe<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tour de France \u201cblows\u201d its appeal against the Tour de X brand in Europe\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By A\u00edda Tar\u00ed L\u00e1zaro, Head of the Trademarks and Brand Intelligence Department at PONS IP On 12 June 2024, just before the start of the well-known Tour de France, the General Court of the European Union (CJEU) dismissed the appeal brought in case T-604\/22 by the Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 du Tour de France, seeking annulment of the ... Read more\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"PONS IP\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-28T16:32:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/tour_de_france_2022-e1737374384364.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/\",\"name\":\"Tour de France \u201cblows\u201d its appeal against the Tour de X brand in Europe\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/tour_de_france_2022-e1737374384364.jpeg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-01-28T16:29:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-28T16:32:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/tour_de_france_2022-e1737374384364.jpeg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/tour_de_france_2022-e1737374384364.jpeg\",\"width\":1200,\"height\":675},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Portada\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"IP Law\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/ip-litigations\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Tour de France \u201cblows\u201d its appeal against the Tour de X brand in Europe\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/\",\"name\":\"PONS IP\",\"description\":\"Consultora Global especializada en Propiedad Industrial e Intelectual.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#organization\",\"name\":\"PONS IP\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/logo-pons-ip.svg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/logo-pons-ip.svg\",\"width\":166,\"height\":26,\"caption\":\"PONS IP\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tour de France \u201cblows\u201d its appeal against the Tour de X brand in Europe","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tour de France \u201cblows\u201d its appeal against the Tour de X brand in Europe","og_description":"By A\u00edda Tar\u00ed L\u00e1zaro, Head of the Trademarks and Brand Intelligence Department at PONS IP On 12 June 2024, just before the start of the well-known Tour de France, the General Court of the European Union (CJEU) dismissed the appeal brought in case T-604\/22 by the Soci\u00e9t\u00e9 du Tour de France, seeking annulment of the ... Read more","og_url":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/","og_site_name":"PONS IP","article_modified_time":"2025-01-28T16:32:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/tour_de_france_2022-e1737374384364.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/","url":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/","name":"Tour de France \u201cblows\u201d its appeal against the Tour de X brand in Europe","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/tour_de_france_2022-e1737374384364.jpeg","datePublished":"2025-01-28T16:29:07+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-28T16:32:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/tour_de_france_2022-e1737374384364.jpeg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/tour_de_france_2022-e1737374384364.jpeg","width":1200,"height":675},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/ip-case-law\/tour-de-france-blows-its-appeal-against-the-tour-de-x-brand-in-europe\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Portada","item":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"IP Law","item":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/ip-litigations\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Tour de France \u201cblows\u201d its appeal against the Tour de X brand in Europe"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/","name":"PONS IP","description":"Consultora Global especializada en Propiedad Industrial e Intelectual.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#organization","name":"PONS IP","url":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/logo-pons-ip.svg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/11\/logo-pons-ip.svg","width":166,"height":26,"caption":"PONS IP"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ip-law\/23603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ip-law"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/ip-law"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/23517"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"categorias-ip-litigations","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ponsip.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categorias-ip-litigations?post=23603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}